1.Atkinson S. The significance of blade geometry in the cutting efficiency of tungsten carbide dental burs at ultrahigh speeds. Br Dent J 1983;155:187-93

2.Meller C, Welk A, Zeligowski T, Splieth C. Comparison of dentin caries excavation with polymer and conventional tungsten carbide burs. Quintessence Int 2006;38:565-9.

3.Vinski I. Two hundred and fifty of rotary instruments in dentistry. Br Dent J 1979;146:217-23.

4.Choi C, Driscoll F, Romberg E. Comparison of cutting efficiencies between electric and air-turbine dental hand pieces. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:101-7

5.Roberson T, Heymann H, Swift J. Sturdevant’s Art & Science of Operative Dentistry, 4th ed. Chapel Hill, NC: Mosby Inc.; 2002.

6.Isik E, OlmezA,Akca G, Sultan N.A microbiological assessment of polymer and conventional carbide burs in caries removal. Pediatric Dent 2010;32:316-23

7.Janota M. Use of scanning electron microscopy for evaluating diamond points. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:88-93.

8.Grajower R, Zeitchick A, Rajstein J. The grinding efficiency of diamond burs. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:422-8.

9.Borges M, Magne P, Pfender E, Heberlein J. Dental diamond burs made with a new technology. J Prosth Dent 1999;82:73-8.

10. Greener H, Linden S. Bur geometry and its relationship to cutting. J Dent Res 1968;47:87-97.

11.Harkness N, Davies H. The cleaning of dental diamond burs. Br Dent J 1983;154:42-5.

12.Marsland A, Shovelton S. Repair in the human dental pulp following cavity preparation. Arch Oral Biol 1970;15:411-23.